No image-derived proof
Blog visuals and page decoration are not accepted as evidence for a physics or engineering claim.
Research log
Exorbit Space Blog
Short notes on space startups, astronomy learning, technology trends, and the model-verification standard behind the site.
Recent Notes
Maintained as generated pages
These legacy blog routes are now generated with the same mathematical verification/status requirement as the rest of the website.
2026-05-11 - Future Space Startups
How small teams can build credible space products when they separate physics, operations, and presentation from hype.
2026-05-10 - Space Technology Trends
Reusable spacecraft, smallsat data layers, robotics, and WebGL education tools are converging into a more inspectable space-technology stack.
2026-05-09 - Future Space Startups
A practical startup path for space education and analysis: start with useful simulations, then add accounts, private datasets, and reports.
2026-05-08 - Space Technology Trends
Space technology pages should make the machinery and the math inspectable: what moves, why it moves, and what is simplified.
2026-05-07 - Astronomy Learning
Astronomy education works best when visual wonder is paired with units, scale, motion, and clear uncertainty.
2026-05-06 - Future Space Startups
The early market for space tools rewards clarity: explain what the model proves, what it approximates, and what the buyer can do with it.
Editorial Standard
How blog claims are handled
Quantitative claims need a model
Numbers, scale, motion, and object layout must be tied to a data source, unit conversion, or equation on the relevant page.
Simulations link back
When a blog post points to a simulator, the simulator carries its own model assumptions, proof notes, and limitations.
Mathematical model
Page model status
This page does not introduce a standalone generated physics or engineering simulation. Any decorative background or static illustration is presentation only; mathematical claims must come from the cited equations, catalog values, or linked model-verification pages.
No image-derived claim
\[\text{visual decoration} \ne \text{physical model}\]
Decorative images, icons, and background effects on this page are not used as evidence for a scientific or engineering statement.
Content claim standard
\[\text{claim} \rightarrow \text{source field or equation}\]
If the text gives a quantitative fact, it must be traceable to a data field, unit conversion, or equation on the relevant detailed page.
Model handoff
\[\text{open } \mathtt{/model\text{-verification/}}\]
Interactive pages linked from here carry their own mathematical model sections with equations, assumptions, proof notes, and limitations.
Verification standard: the rendered object must be reproducible from stated equations, catalog parameters, or explicit geometric transforms. Visual reference images may inform presentation only; they are not the source of orbital positions, field vectors, accretion-disk gradients, timing, or engineering layout.
Limitations: browser scenes may use bounded scale, compressed distances, simplified two-body dynamics, schematic transfer curves, or educational approximations where full numerical ephemerides, CFD, finite-element models, or general-relativistic ray tracing are outside the page scope. Those simplifications are part of the model contract, not hidden image-based construction.